Semantic markers indicate a change of direction. Without semantic markers the reader infers that more of the same will follow. Thus, 'The second sentence has more momentum' would normally be followed by an amplification of this idea, for example 'It propels the reader forward by the use of a semantic marker at the beginning.' 'Because', therefore, indicates a change of direction from amplification to causality. 'Thus' indicates a change from cause to effect. Without it the reader would expect another cause. 'Moreover' indicates a change of direction from effect back to another cause which is signalled by 'because'. 'In contrast' indicates the sharpest change of direction, onto an analysis of a different sentence.
Semantic markers are therefore extremely important as tools to increase coherence and momentum. They should, however, only be used when necessary, that is when a change of direction occurs.
Look at the pairs of sentences below. Decide whether a semantic marker is needed, and if so which and where.
One of the most common mistakes is to use markers of addition - Moreover, Furthermore, etc - too much, particularly at the beginning of paragraphs. This is unnecessary because the very fact that a new paragraph has started indicates that an additional point will be made.
This mistake is often symptomatic of a lack of a clear line of argument. The essay is perhaps nothing more than a list of points of the 'and-another-important-thing-is' type.
Similarly, the overuse of markers of addition within paragraphs may be an attempt to create coherence from a list. Remember the incoherent list paragraph about Hegel:
Hegel has been immensely influential, not least for bequeathing the dialectic and the division of history into a few great epochs to Marx. He was the son of a tax official in Stuttgart. While at the theological seminary at Tubingen, he became interested in the works of Rousseau and Kant. His Lectures on the Philosophy of History outline the developmental pattern of world history. He was worried by class divisions but did not see them as unbridgeable.
A student redrafting this might be tempted to slip in a few markers to try to disguise the real problem:
Hegel has been immensely influential, not least for bequeathing the dialectic and the division of history into a few great epochs to Marx. He was the son of a tax official in Stuttgart. Moreover, while at the theological seminary at Tubingen, he became interested in the works of Rousseau and Kant. Furthermore, his Lectures on the Philosophy of History outline the developmental pattern of world history. In addition, he was worried by class divisions but did not see them as unbridgeable.
This is simply papering over the cracks when a new wall needs to be built.
Having reached this point in the course, you should now have the knowledge and most of the fundamental academic writing skills necessary to do the rebuilding. Click here to move on to the next section: how to incorporate the work of others.
Course Contents / Academic Editing Service
© 2002 Martin Paterson